🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic talks with the United States as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat declared solely negotiations produced results, and revealed recent overtures had originated from intermediaries to restart talks with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Path

Araghchi is walking a difficult course since Iran does not want be seen to be acting from a stance of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient militarily and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Previous Talks Unexpectedly Ended

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that ended with the American leader claiming the locations had been destroyed. Subsequently, European countries used their privilege to reimpose international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could work inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Officials stated on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Position

Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be revived in various formats if talks reopen.

The American leader in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to resume discussions, but confidentially Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet receiving coherent offers from the United States either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of passivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran states negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his remarks to the forum, intended to paint the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the idea of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the 12-day war showed the conflict could not be settled by armed force. He asserted the attacks started with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making confidence difficult to restore.

Diplomacy Remains the Final Answer

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled negotiations; it was America and the European states that had repeatedly tried to enforce their desires during the talks. Diplomacy can still be alive and continues the primary solution to settle conflicts, but its criteria, regulations and fundamentals must be respected."

"If they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and respect, they will receive a response in the equivalent tone."

Repair and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the battle of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We gained numerous insights from this conflict; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to destroy, stays intact. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more united, and more backing of the government and the nation in the aftermath of this assault."